Nowadays, everything is effortless, smooth, automatic, and works. It used to require a lot more effort. Back then I just found Fedora more logical. If something was wrong it was much easier to figure it out than with other distributions. And it was more reliable. During the big hype about Ubuntu and when Macbook Air came out, I really liked the hardware and bought it. Mac OS, however, I found simply horrible. After a week I decided to never boot that again and put Ubuntu on it.
Nothing worked, problems all over the place. I replaced Ubuntu with Fedora. Everything worked after installation.
Never again even considered anything else. Recently with a couple of kernel releases pulseaudio was fucked up on one of my machines. I had to tinker. It went away. It is a rare occurrence. I think RPM is better. It was too fragile and and unpolished, rattling like a twenty year old car.
I felt that for some time it was actually getting worse. In the beginning it was almost on par with KDE. Still, Fedora was still better even though I had to manually switch a few things, remove some packages and add some after the installation or spend time un-selecting and selecting during installation.
Now it is much easier. I have one machine on which I had installed Fedora 19, I think, it was in the teens, and I have been just upgrading ever since. And there are images with KDE. There are more options for querying, check out the man page for rpm.
For example:. The changelog plugin is included in the dnf-plugins-core package that is installed by default. You can list the files of a yet to be installed package like this:. I do use Fedora for a long time. Cinnamon in Fedora is very well updated and managed at least at the time of writing.
Other tools I use is VIM which is very up-to-date and qemu-kvm virtualization where I run Fedora server, Fedora server with testing repos and Debian for many cli tasks and web-server. I switched to Fedora since F17 and I still love it. The most exciting thing for me is, to use my Laptop hardware much longer than with Windows.
The second point is I love the open source philosophy. I also like the Gnome Desktop, because of its clear design and the very well usability, also on touch screens. Nice article! Being a long time Fedora user, it is my daily driver, and is the distribution installed on all my home computers. And what did you switch from?
Aside from the topic of what OS an unknown person uses. Are you year old poet? And I guess I contribute to Fedora now apparently. I have been using Fedora exclusively for the last three years. I love Fedora. It is a distribution that merges two characteristics hard to combine.
It is stable and provides cutting-edge software. The only critic is on the forum. When I have a problem with a distro, I always do my research to solve the problem, but if I cannot find the solution, I ask for help in the forum. In these situations, I had to look for the answer in other forums or remain with unsolved doubts if it was a fedora-specific question. I used different distros and asked questions in forums belonging to both ends the user-friendliness spectrum from Mint to Gentoo, but I have seen this repeated level of disdain only in the Fedora forum; many times from old users.
Fedora might be the perfect distro, but it has its flows in the forum. It will automatically update the repository and fetch the latest version. Most Linux software developers provide their apps in both.
That being said, the newer version of Fedora seems to make it much easier to install proprietary software on the OS, and the repository is populating with more options. However, it will be a long time before it becomes as big as that of Ubuntu. Back in its earlier days, Linux failed to support new hardware, and compatibility issues plagued almost all distros, including Ubuntu and Fedora. Currently, Linux has built a reputation of running smoothly on both older and newer hardware.
In fact, if you are up for the challenge, you can even run Linux on a toaster. However, users still face issues when it comes to installing graphic drivers on their Linux PC. The main problem is with Nvidia graphic cards, which require proprietary drivers to function properly.
This is another one of the areas where Ubuntu gets the win over Fedora. Whereas, in the case of Fedora, it only provides you with open-source software. This makes it considerably harder to install the proprietary Nvidia drivers on the OS. That being said, there is an open-source Nouveau driver developed for Nvidia graphic cards on Linux OS.
But beware that it runs into the occasional system crash and system freeze during boot time. Taking all of these into account, gaming and hardware support are clearly better on Ubuntu in comparison to Fedora. Ubuntu and Fedora follow different development cycles and release newer versions at different rates. With Ubuntu, you have the option to choose between two release cycles.
First, there is the regular release or STR Short Term Release , which is released every six months and supported for nine months. Under the regular release, users get access to newer features and the latest software versions more quickly than the LTS version, but it also encounters more bugs. The LTS version is suited for users who are looking for better stability and planning to use the same system configuration for a long time.
You are promised a new Fedora version every six months; however, Fedora is infamous for missing their release schedule by a couple of weeks. The best thing about Fedora is that every release comes with all the bleeding-edge technologies available in the Linux community.
You will get access to software that will be added to Ubuntu far later. But at the same time, it is also plagued with random bugs, which makes the distro more unstable compared to Ubuntu — albeit usable. Overall, Fedora is more catered towards the enthusiasts and developers who want access to the latest technologies as quickly as possible.
Although Ubuntu and Fedora are primarily aimed at desktop users, both distros offer a version dedicated for server use. With Ubuntu, you have the Ubuntu Server edition. It is available in three different options — Ubuntu server VMs, on-demand physical machines with Ubuntu server pre-installed, and the bare Ubuntu server ISO file to let you install it on your own hardware.
If you are familiar with the Ubuntu desktop, you will find the Ubuntu server very similar and easy to use. In fact, the server distro is actively used by many professionals for their web hosting and other needs. This is mainly because upgrading and rebooting a server every nine months is a big hassle and a major inconvenience if your server receives a lot of traffic. CentOS is also more stable and offers longer support than Fedora, which is compulsory when talking about servers.
Other than this, Ubuntu has possibly one of the best documentations compared to all other Linux distros. If you have any issues understanding how to do certain tasks on Ubuntu, you can check out their documentation to find clear step-by-step instructions to help you. This has been a guide to the highest distinction among Ubuntu vs Fedora.
Here we additionally consider the Ubuntu vs Fedora key differentiation by infographics and comparison table. You may also look at the following articles to learn more —. Submit Next Question. By signing up, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
Forgot Password? This website or its third-party tools use cookies, which are necessary to its functioning and required to achieve the purposes illustrated in the cookie policy. By closing this banner, scrolling this page, clicking a link or continuing to browse otherwise, you agree to our Privacy Policy.
Ubuntu vs Fedora By Aanchal Singh. Popular Course in this category. Red Hat is an enterprise focused Linux distribution. Both Ubuntu and Fedora are backed by their parent corporations. Enterprise backing is important because it ensures that the Linux distribution is well-maintained.
Hobbyists distributions created by a group of individuals often crumble under workload. You might have seen reasonably popular distribution projects being shutdown for this sole reason. The fact that both Ubuntu and Fedora are supported by a two Linux-based enterprises makes them a viable choice over other independent distributions. The comparison between Ubuntu and Fedora was primarily aimed at desktop users so far. But a discussion about Linux is not complete until you include servers.
Ubuntu is not only popular on desktop, it also has a good presence on the server side. If you are familiar with Ubuntu as a desktop, you might not feel uncomfortable with Ubuntu server edition. I started with Ubuntu desktop and now my websites are hosted on Linux servers running Ubuntu. Fedora too has a server edition and some people use it as well. As you can see, both Ubuntu and Fedora are similar to each other on several points.
Ubuntu does take lead when it comes to software availability, driver installation and online support. And these are the points that make Ubuntu a better choice, specially for inexperienced Linux users.
If you want to get familiar with Red Hat or just want something different for a change, Fedora is a good starting point. If you have some experience with Linux or if you want to use only open-source software, Fedora is an excellent choice as well. In the end, it is really up to you to decide if you want to use Fedora or Ubuntu.
Which distribution do you prefer and why? Do share your views in the comment section. Also a movie buff with a soft corner for film noir. Author makes excellent points about both these big Linux Desktop releases.
As a end user who has tried both I think Ubuntu is better for the average user. Fedora is more a purist Linux open source sort of user that is more about cutting edge Linux and pure Gnome DE.
0コメント